Think • Understand • Question

Azaad Kalam
← Essays

The Poona Pact of 1932 — The Gandhi–Ambedkar Agreement That Changed Indian Politics

N. Singh · ·6 min read

Translated from the original Hindi · मूल हिंदी लेख पढ़ें

24 September 1932—that historic scene at Pune’s Yerwada Central Jail was the most dramatic and far-reaching turning point in modern Indian history.

Following the Round Table Conferences, British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald had announced the ‘Communal Award’, under which India’s untouchables (Dalits) were granted the right to a ‘Separate Electorate’, akin to Muslims and Sikhs. This meant quite simply that only a Dalit candidate would stand from Dalit settlements and only Dalit voters would cast their ballots to elect them.

Mahatma Gandhi embarked upon a ‘fast unto death’ in Yerwada Jail against this decision. Gandhiji argued that a separate electorate would permanently fracture Hindu society and entrench the scourge of untouchability forever.

Gandhiji’s health began deteriorating by the day. An acute tension gripped the entire country. Had anything happened to Gandhiji, there was a grave peril of terrible violence erupting against Dalits across the nation.

Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar was under immense moral and social pressure. Ultimately, with a heavy heart and profound inner turmoil, Babasaheb arrived at Yerwada Jail and signed the historic ‘Poona Pact’ before Gandhiji.

The separate electorate was withdrawn, and in its stead, ‘reserved seats’ (joint electorate with reserved seats) were accepted for Dalits within general constituencies.

The question is: ninety years on, looking at the state of Indian politics before us today, did the Poona Pact truly grant political emancipation to Dalit society? Or did it merely foist upon Dalits ‘mute’ and ‘helpless’ representatives who keep their lips sealed even while sitting in Parliament as their own community faces oppression?


The Irony of the Joint Electorate: People’s Representatives Enslaved to Their ‘Masters’

In the later years of his life, Babasaheb Ambedkar expressed deep regret over the consequences of the Poona Pact.

In his book ‘What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables’, he wrote candidly that the reservation secured through the Poona Pact had effectively strangled the genuine voice of the Dalits:

  1. Community Vote versus Majority Vote: On a reserved seat, the candidate is indeed from the SC or ST community, but 75% to 80% of the voters in that constituency are non-Dalits. The direct outcome of this is that only that Dalit leader can win who keeps the majority upper castes and his party high command pleased. If a Dalit leader speaks up for his community’s self-respect and land rights, the majority electorate will never vote for him!
  2. Rubber Stamps of the Party High Command: Today, there are 84 Members of Parliament from the Scheduled Castes and 47 from the Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha. A total of 131 reserved MPs! Yet, when atrocities are committed against a Dalit daughter in Hathras, Una, or any corner of the country, or when feudal attacks take place against Dalits, does the voice of any of these 131 MPs echo in Parliament? Absolutely not! They remain bound by their party whip and do nothing but sing praises of the high command.
  3. The Annihilation of Independent Leadership: Babasaheb wanted Dalit society to choose its own leaders—leaders beholden to no political party. The Poona Pact crushed independent Dalit leadership, reducing it to a mere pocket borough of national parties.

Separate Electorate versus Poona Pact (Joint Electorate): A Comparative Analysis

Criterion Separate Electorate (Babasaheb’s Original Proposal) Poona Pact / Joint Electorate (Gandhiji’s Model)
Who is the Voter? Only Dalit voters would elect the Dalit candidate Voters of all castes across the constituency collectively elect the Dalit candidate
Accountability The candidate would be entirely accountable solely to their oppressed community The candidate depends upon the mercy of majority voters and the party high command
Character of Leadership Fearless, self-respecting, rebellious, and uncompromising leader Submissive, obedient, toeing the party line, and compliant leader
Long-Term Impact A politically independent and decisive third force A mere vote bank and mute spectator of mainstream major parties

Bitter Truth from the Book: N. Singh’s Historical Dissection

Author N. Singh, in the chapter ‘Poona Pact: The Incomplete Truth’ of his book ‘Anokha Bharat’, writes:

“The Poona Pact did secure seats for Dalits in Parliament, but it stripped away their genuine political voice. Today, only that leader wins from reserved seats who flatters his party masters; the system weeds out anyone who dares to rebel for the rights of their community beforehand. 131 reserved MPs sit in Parliament, yet Dalits face atrocities daily across the country, their settlements are burnt down, and a deafening silence prevails in Parliament. This silence proves that the Poona Pact handed Dalits not reservation, but a deed of political bonded labour. As long as only those leaders who appease their party bosses continue to get elected from reserved seats, Babasaheb’s dream of an egalitarian India can never be fulfilled!”
— N. Singh (Anokha Bharat, pp. 212–213)

The author further points towards a very bold solution:

“If we are to rectify this historical anomaly of the Poona Pact, we must consider a dual voting system or proportional representation in reserved constituencies, so that the oppressed community can elect a true representative of its own choosing.”
— (Anokha Bharat, p. 218)


Four Practical Steps to Rectify This Anomaly

  1. Primary Voting System: Prior to the election on a reserved seat, a primary ballot should be held amongst the voters of that community, and only the two candidates who secure the highest number of votes from their own community should contest the main election.
  2. Independent National Caucus of Dalit-Adivasi MPs: On the lines of the ‘Black Caucus’ in the US Congress, all 131 SC/ST MPs in the Indian Parliament should rise above party politics and form an independent caucus that can unite and exercise a veto on issues concerning the oppressed.
  3. Exemption from the Party Whip: On bills pertaining to social justice, reservation, and human rights, MPs from reserved categories should be exempted from their party whip so that they can vote according to the dictates of their conscience.
  4. Proportional Representation: In place of the ‘first-past-the-post’ system, a proportional voting system on the German model should be introduced in the country so that smaller and marginalised sections secure direct seats in proportion to their vote share.

A Question for Reflection (The Message of the Book)

Is the spectacle of 131 reserved MPs sitting deaf and mute in Parliament not the greatest betrayal of Babasaheb’s sacrifices and dreams?

To understand that historic clash between Gandhi and Ambedkar, the invisible links of the Poona Pact, and this greatest unsolved mystery of modern Indian politics, every Indian must read this chapter of N. Singh’s acclaimed book ‘Anokha Bharat’ with an objective eye.

The Poona Pact did secure seats for Dalits in Parliament, but it stripped away their genuine political voice. Today, only that leader wins from reserved seats who flatters his party masters; the system weeds out anyone who dares to rebel for the rights of their community beforehand.

Azaad Kalam — N. Singh

Think • Understand • Question

—— People | Ideas | Towards a Better Society